Assessing feasibility of conducting medication review with follow-up among older adults at community pharmacy: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Medication review with follow-up is essential for optimising medication utilisation among the older adult population in primary healthcare. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing medication reviews with follow-up for older adults in community pharmacies and examined potential outcomes on medication use. METHOD: A pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted with 4 cluster-randomised community pharmacies to assess the feasibility of the intervention. Two community pharmacies served as intervention and control groups. Both groups recruited older adults over 60 who were followed over 6 months. The translated Medication use Questionnaire (MedUseQ) was administered at baseline and 6 months for both groups. The outcomes were to assess the feasibility of conducting medication review with follow-up and the probable medication use outcomes from the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention and control groups comprised 14 and 13 older adults. A total of 35 recommendations were made by pharmacists in the intervention group and 8 in the control group. MedUseQ was easily administered, providing some evidence the feasibility of the intervention. However, there were feasibility challenges such as a lack of pharmacists, collaborative practice, difficulties with the tool language, time constraints, and limited funds. Questionnaire results provided a signal of improvement in medication administration, adherence, and polypharmacy among intervention participants. The incidence of drug related problems was significantly higher in the control group (median = 1) after 6 months, U = 15, z = - 2.98, p = 0.01. CONCLUSION: Medication review with follow-up is potentialy practical in community pharmacies, but there are feasibility issues. While these challenges can be addressed, it is essential to study larger sample sizes to establish more robust evidence regarding outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05297461.

The Impact of Pharmacist Medication Reviews on Geriatric Patients: A Scoping Review.

Medication review is an intervention with the potential to reduce drug-related problems (DRPs) in the elderly. This study aimed to determine the effect of pharmacists' medication reviews on geriatric patients. This study accessed two online databases, MEDLINE Complete and Scopus, and examined all studies published in English between 2019 and 2023, except for reviews. The studies included (1) participants over 65 years of age and (2) medication reviews conducted by pharmacists. The titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed for data extraction to determine whether the studies satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Forty-four of the initial 709 articles were included in this study. The articles included discussions on the incidence rates of DRPs and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) (n=21), hospitalization (n=14), medication adherence (n=9), quality of life (QoL) (n=8), and falls (n=7). Pharmacist medication reviews were associated with a reduced incidence of DRPs and PIMs, and improved adherence to medications. Patients' overall QoL is also increasing. However, pharmacist medication reviews were not strongly associated with decreased hospitalization or falls. A pharmacist's medication review may be a feasible intervention for reducing the incidence rates of DRPs and PIMs, regardless of whether it is performed as a sole intervention or supplemented with other interventions. The intervention was also effective in increasing medication adherence and QoL.

Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation service for patients after discharge from tertiary hospitals to primary care in Singapore: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Medication discrepancies commonly occur when patients are transferred between care settings. Despite the presence of medication reconciliation services (MRS), medication discrepancies are still prevalent, which has clinical costs and implications. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of various stakeholders on how the MRS can be optimized in Singapore. METHODS: This is a descriptive qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews with 30 participants from the National Healthcare Group, including family physicians (N = 10), pharmacists (N = 10), patients recently discharged from restructured hospitals (N = 7) and their caregivers (N = 3) were conducted. All transcribed interviews were coded independently by three coders and inductive thematic analysis approach was used. RESULTS: Five core themes were identified. (1) The MRS enhanced healthcare services in various aspects including efficiency and health literacy; (2) There were several challenges in delivering the MRS covering processes, technology and training; (3) Issues with suitable patient selection and follow-up; (4) Barriers to scaling up of MRS that involve various stakeholders, cross-sector integration and environmental restrictions; and finally (5) Role definition of the pharmacist to all the stakeholders. CONCLUSION: This study identified the role of MRS in enhancing healthcare services and explored the challenges encountered in the provision of MRS from family physicians, pharmacists, patients and their caregivers. These findings supported the need for a shift of MRS towards a more comprehensive medication review model. Future improvement work to the MRS can be conducted based on the findings.

A Drug Safety Briefing (II) in Transplantation from Real-World Individual Pharmacotherapy Management to Prevent Patient and Graft from Polypharmacy Risks at the Very Earliest Stage.

For early and long-term patient and graft survival, drug therapy in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation inevitably involves polypharmacy in patients with widely varying and even abruptly changing conditions. In this second part, relevant medication briefing is provided, in addition to the scores defined in the previously published first part on the design of the Individual Pharmacotherapy Management (IPM). The focus is on the growing spectrum of contemporary polypharmacy in transplant patients, including early and long-term follow-up medications. 1. Unlike the available drug-drug interaction (DDI) tables, for the first time, this methodological all-in-one device refers to the entire risks, including contraindications, special warnings, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and DDIs. The selection of 65 common critical drugs results from 10 years of daily IPM with real-world evidence from more than 60,800 IPM inpatient and outpatient medication analyses. It includes immunosuppressants and typical critical antimicrobials, analgesics, antihypertensives, oral anticoagulants, antiarrhythmics, antilipids, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antipropulsives, antiemetics, propulsives, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), sedatives, antineoplastics, and protein kinase inhibitors. As a guide for the attending physician, the drug-related risks are presented in an alphabetical overview based on the Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) and the literature. 2. Further briefing refers to own proven clinical measures to manage unavoidable drug-related high-risk situations. Drug-induced injuries to the vulnerable graft and the immunosuppressed comorbid patient require such standardized, intensive IPM and the comprehensive preventive briefing toolset to optimize the outcomes in the polypharmacy setting.

Clinical risk assessment of modelled situations in a pharmaceutical decision support system: a modified e-Delphi exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical decision support systems (PDSSs) use reasoning software to match patient data to modelled situations likely to cause drug-related problems (DRPs) or adverse drug events. To aid decision-making, modelled situations must be linked to well-defined systemic clinical risks. AIM: To obtain expert consensus on the level of clinical risk for patients associated with each modelled situation that could be addressed using a PDSS. METHOD: A two-round e-Delphi survey was conducted from February to April 2022, involving 20 experts from four French-speaking countries. Participants had to rate modelled situations on two five-point Likert scales, assessing the likelihood of clinical consequences and their severity. The degree of consensus was determined as the proportion of participants providing risk scores in line with the median. The combined median scores for likelihood and severity provided the level of risk according to the Clinical Risk Situation for Patients (CRiSP) scale, formalized via validated tools. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved consensus (≥ 75% agreement) on 48 out of 52 modelled clinical situations. Among these, 45 were categorized as high or extreme risk. The most common DRP identified was overdosing, accounting for 22% of cases. Furthermore, DRPs involving cardiovascular, psychiatric, and endocrinological drug classes were prevalent, constituting 45, 13, and 9% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Through consensus, our study identified 45 modelled clinical situations associated with high or extreme risks. This study highlights the interest of using PDSSs to prevent harm in patients and, on a large scale, document the impact of the pharmacist in preventing, intercepting and managing iatrogenic drug risk.

Development of machine-learning models using pharmacy inquiry database for predicting dose-related inquiries in a tertiary teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a significant concern in healthcare. Pharmacists play a vital role in detecting and resolving DRPs to improve patient safety. A pharmacy inquiry program was established in a tertiary teaching hospital to document inquiries about physicians' orders, aimed at preventing potential DRPs or providing medication information during order reviews. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop machine-learning models using a pharmacy inquiry database to predict dose-related inquiries based on prescriptions and patient information. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 20,393 pharmacy inquiries collected between January 2018 and February 2023. Data included prescription information (drug ingredient, dose, unit, and frequency), patient characteristics (age, sex, weight, and department), and renal function. The inquiries were categorized into two classes: dose-related inquiries (e.g., wrong dose and inappropriate regimen) and non-dose-related inquiries (e.g., inappropriate drug form and administration route). Six machine-learning models were developed: logistic regression, support vector classifier, decision tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and categorical boosting. To evaluate the performance of the models, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the accuracy were compared. RESULTS: The CatBoost model achieved the highest performance (sensitivity: 0.92; accuracy: 0.79). The SHapley Additive exPlanations values highlighted the importance of features in the model predictions, drug ingredients, units, and renal function, in that order. Notably, lower renal function positively contributed to the prediction of dose-related inquiries. Additionally, the subsequent feature importance among drug ingredients showed that drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid, famotidine, metformin, and spironolactone strongly influenced the prediction of dose-related inquiries. CONCLUSION: Machine-learning models that use pharmacy inquiry data can effectively predict dose-related inquiries. Further external validation and refinement of the models are required for broader applications in healthcare settings. These findings provide valuable guidance for healthcare professionals and highlight the potential of machine learning in pharmacists' decision-making.

Implementation of medication reviews in community pharmacy: reaching consensus on stakeholders' recommendations for mechanisms of change using the nominal group technique.

BACKGROUND: Since 2022, patients with five or more medicines are eligible for a medication review (MR) in a community pharmacy remunerated by the German health system. However, implementation has been slow, with few pharmacies providing MRs. Stakeholders' input is necessary to detail how implementation strategies can be executed effectively on a national level. Prior research identified "external facilitation" and "altering incentives" as crucial strategies to achieve implementation outcomes. AIM: To gather stakeholders' recommendations for, and obtain consensus on, mechanisms of change that allow implementation strategies to work in practice. METHOD: The consensus method used was the nominal group technique (NGT) with NGT-discussions held separately with pharmacy owners and pharmacy chambers employees. Votes were summed and the relative importance (rI) calculated, defined as (score achieved for a mechanism)/(maximum possible score) × 100. Content analysis provided context for the highest ranked mechanisms and allowed linking to implementation outcomes. RESULTS: Four NGT-discussions were held in 2023 (n = 2 owners; n = 2 chamber employees) with a total of 17 participants. The overall highest ranked mechanisms were fit-for-purpose software (rI = 154.7) detailed process support (rI = 104.9) and an expert support line (rI = 77.7). These together with financial viability (rI = 40.0) were prioritised by both participant groups. Three mechanisms were favoured for both implementation strategies, namely software, process support and materials (rI = 34.3). CONCLUSION: This study identified stakeholders' priorities for mechanisms of change to implement MRs in community pharmacies. Focusing efforts on the prioritised mechanisms is likely to significantly advance a national implementation plan for countries which are at an early implementation stage.

Collaborative medication reviews in community pharmacies-Drug-related problems and the process of communicating them with physicians: A retrospective validation study.

Background and Aims: Cooperation between practicing community pharmacists (PPs) and primary care physicians has traditionally been limited, with scarce communication on therapeutic issues. The aim of this study was to assess how PPs communicate in writing with physicians regarding (1) the clinically relevant problems they have identified in patients' medications and (2) recommendations to solve the problems to identify development needs in the communication process. Methods: This retrospective validation study assessed medication reviews conducted by PPs in collaboration with home care nurses, practice nurses, and physicians for 46 older (≥65 years) home care clients in the Municipality of Lohja, Finland. The therapeutic and communicative appropriateness of clinically relevant drug-related problems (DRPs) identified by PPs and reported in writing to physicians was blindly evaluated by (1) an accredited pharmacist (AP) and (2) two physicians specialized in geriatric pharmacotherapy. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted to compare the assessments. Results: The PPs (n = 13) identified 189 DRPs and made 4.1 recommendations per patient in 46 written reports to physicians. Of the PPs' written recommendations for medication changes, 46% (155/334) were the same as those by the AP. The two specialized physicians evaluated 69% and 67% of PPs' recommendations to be clinically relevant. The way the DRPs and recommendations to solve them were communicated was evaluated as appropriate in 38% and 38%, respectively, of the case reports written by the PPs. Conclusion: The PPs were able identify DRPs quite well, particularly inappropriate medication use, according to current care guidelines and formularies. It was found that improvement was needed in the communication of DRPs in written reports with physicians. Interprofessional learning by working in care teams would be suitable for strengthening patient care-oriented competencies.

Appropriate Prescribing for older adults with Multimorbidity (Pro-M): protocol for a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate prescribing is common among older adults with multimorbidity due to various reasons, from concurrent application of multiple single-disease clinical guidelines to fragmentation of care. Interventions such as medication review have been implemented worldwide to reduce inappropriate prescribing for older adults. However, the implementability of such interventions are underexplored in the outpatient clinics in Singapore's public hospitals. Hence, the Pro-M study aims to assess the feasibility of implementing a physician-pharmacist collaborative care intervention in geriatric medicine outpatient clinics to facilitate appropriate prescribing for older adults in Singapore. METHODS: This is a single-arm, non-randomised feasibility study using a pre-post evaluation design. This study consists of two parts: (1) implementation phase of the intervention (6 months) and an (2) evaluation phase (3 months). Eligible patients will be recruited from geriatric medicine outpatient clinics at two public hospitals in Singapore through convenience sampling. The main components of the Pro-M intervention are: (1) pharmacist-facilitated medication reviews with feedback on any medication issues and potential recommendations to physicians, and (2) physicians communicating changes to other relevant prescribers. The evaluation phase will involve surveying and interviewing physicians and pharmacists involved in the implementation of the intervention. A mixed-method approach will be employed for data collection and analysis. The quantitative and qualitative findings will be triangulated and reported using Proctor's implementation outcomes: appropriateness, penetration, acceptability, fidelity, feasibility, and sustainability. A basic cost analysis will be conducted alongside the study. DISCUSSION: This is a phase 2 study to test the feasibility of implementing an intervention that was co-created with stakeholders during phase 1 development of an intervention to optimise prescribing for older adults with multimorbidity. The implementation will be assessed using Proctor's implementation outcomes to provide insights on the process and the feasibility of implementing medication reviews for older adults with multimorbidity as a routine practice in outpatient clinics. Data collected from this study will inform a subsequent scale-up study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05756478. Registered on 06 March 2023.

Effects of comprehensive medication review on opioid overuse among medicare beneficiaries.

Objectives: This study examined the effects of the comprehensive medication review of Medicare medication therapy management programs on opioid overuse among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed Medicare data from 2016 to 2017. The intervention group included Medicare beneficiaries who newly received comprehensive medication review in 2017; the control group referred to patients who met the general eligible criteria for the medication therapy management program but did not enroll in 2016 or 2017. Propensity score matching was performed to increase characteristic compatibility between the intervention and control groups. Three measures of opioid overuse were analyzed: use of opioids at a high dosage, use of opioids from multiple providers, and concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines. The effects of comprehensive medication review on opioid overuse were analyzed with a multivariate logistic regression with an interaction term between the receipt of comprehensive medication review and the year 2017. Key Findings: The proportion of concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines declined at a greater rate among the recipients (2.21%) than non-recipients (1.55%) of the comprehensive medication review. In the adjusted analysis, the odds ratio of no concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines was 5% higher (1.05; 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.09) among recipients than non-recipients. These significant findings were not found for the other two measures of opioid overuse. Conclusions: Comprehensive medication review is associated with reduced concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines among Medicare beneficiaries. Such service should be incorporated into the current approaches for addressing the opioid epidemic.

Clinical decision support system supported interventions in hospitalized older patients: a matter of natural course and adequate timing.

BACKGROUND: Drug-related problems (DRPs) and potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) are associated with adverse patient and health care outcomes. In the setting of hospitalized older patients, Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) could reduce PIP and therefore improve clinical outcomes. However, prior research showed a low proportion of adherence to CDSS recommendations by clinicians with possible explanatory factors such as little clinical relevance and alert fatigue. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of a CDSS in a real-life setting of hospitalized older patients. We aim to (I) report the natural course and interventions based on the top 20 rule alerts (the 20 most frequently generated alerts per clinical rule) of generated red CDSS alerts (those requiring action) over time from day 1 to 7 of hospitalization; and (II) to explore whether an optimal timing can be defined (in terms of day per rule). METHODS: All hospitalized patients aged ≥ 60 years, admitted to Zuyderland Medical Centre (the Netherlands) were included. The evaluation of the CDSS was investigated using a database used for standard care. Our CDSS was run daily and was evaluated on day 1 to 7 of hospitalization. We collected demographic and clinical data, and moreover the total number of CDSS alerts; the total number of top 20 rule alerts; those that resulted in an action by the pharmacist and the course of outcome of the alerts on days 1 to 7 of hospitalization. RESULTS: In total 3574 unique hospitalized patients, mean age 76.7 (SD 8.3) years and 53% female, were included. From these patients, in total 8073 alerts were generated; with the top 20 of rule alerts we covered roughly 90% of the total. For most rules in the top 20 the highest percentage of resolved alerts lies somewhere between day 4 and 5 of hospitalization, after which there is equalization or a decrease. Although for some rules, there is a gradual increase in resolved alerts until day 7. The level of resolved rule alerts varied between the different clinical rules; varying from > 50-70% (potassium levels, anticoagulation, renal function) to less than 25%. CONCLUSION: This study reports the course of the 20 most frequently generated alerts of a CDSS in a setting of hospitalized older patients. We have shown that for most rules, irrespective of an intervention by the pharmacist, the highest percentage of resolved rules is between day 4 and 5 of hospitalization. The difference in level of resolved alerts between the different rules, could point to more or less clinical relevance and advocates further research to explore ways of optimizing CDSSs by adjustment in timing and number of alerts to prevent alert fatigue.

Pharmacological treatments and medication-related problems in nursing homes in Catalonia: a multidisciplinary approach.

Background: Aging correlates with increased frailty, multi-morbidity, and chronic diseases. Furthermore, treating the aged often entails polypharmacy to achieve optimal disease management, augmenting medication-related problems (MRPs). Few guidelines and tools address the problem of polypharmacy and MRPs, mainly within the institutionalized elderly population. Routine pharmacological review is needed among institutionalized patients. This pharmacological review may improve with a multidisciplinary approach of a collaboration of multiple health professionals. This study aimed to describe institutionalized patients, systematically review their medication plans, and then give recommendations and identify MRPs. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using data obtained from patients living in five nursing homes in the northern area of Barcelona, Spain. The inclusion criteria comprised institutionalized patients with public health coverage provided by the Health Department of Catalonia. A detailed description of the clinical characteristics, chronic diseases, pharmacological treatments, recommendations, incomplete data, and MRPs, such as potential drug-drug interactions, therapeutic duplications, contraindications, and drugs deemed inappropriate or of doubtful efficacy, was made. The clinical pharmacologist was the medical doctor specialist who acted as the coordinator of the multidisciplinary team and actively reviewed all the prescribed medications to make recommendations and detect MRPs. Results: A total of 483 patients were included. Patients had a mean age of 86.3 (SD 8.8) years, and 72.0% were female individuals. All patients had at least three health-related problems, with a mean of 17.4 (SD 5.6). All patients, except one, had a minimum of one prescription, with a mean of 8.22 drugs prescribed (SD 3.5) per patient. Recommendations were made for 82.4% of the patients. Of these recommendations, verification of adequate use was made for 69.3% and withdrawal of a drug for 49.5%. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a high prevalence of health-related problems and several prescribed drugs in nursing homes in Catalonia. Many recommendations were made, confirming the increased proportion of polypharmacy, MRPs, and the need for standardized interventions. A multidisciplinary team approach, including general practitioners, geriatric assessments, a clinical pharmacist, and a clinical pharmacologist, should address this problem.

Medication review and deprescribing in different healthcare settings: a position statement from an Italian scientific consortium.

Recent medical advancements have increased life expectancy, leading to a surge in patients affected by multiple chronic diseases and consequent polypharmacy, especially among older adults. This scenario increases the risk of drug interactions and adverse drug reactions, highlighting the need for medication review and deprescribing to reduce inappropriate medications and optimize therapeutic regimens, with the ultimate goal to improving patients' health and quality of life. This position statement from the Italian Scientific Consortium on medication review and deprescribing aims to describe key elements, strategies, tools, timing, and healthcare professionals to be involved, for the implementation of medication review and deprescribing in different healthcare settings (i.e., primary care, hospital, long-term care facilities, and palliative care). Challenges and potential solutions for the implementation of medication review and deprescribing are also discussed.

Development of a multidisciplinary medication management program in nursing homes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial : Multidisciplinary medication management in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications are common among nursing home residents and are associated with negative outcomes. Although deprescribing has been proposed as a way to curtail these problems, the best way to implement multidisciplinary comprehensive medication review and deprescribing and its real impact in specific high-risk populations, such as nursing home residents, is still unclear. This multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial aims to assess the effects of a multidisciplinary mediation management program on medication use and health problems. METHODS: A total of 1,672 residents aged ≥ 65 years from 22 nursing homes in South Korea who meet the targeted criteria, such as the use of ≥ 10 medications, are eligible to participate. The experimental group will receive a comprehensive medication review, deprescription, and multidisciplinary case conference with the help of platform. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, at the end of the intervention, as well as at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the end of the intervention. The primary endpoints will be the rate of adverse drug events, number of potentially inappropriate medications/potentially inappropriate medication users/two or more central nervous system drug/ central nervous system drug users, delirium, emergency department visits, hospitalization, and falls. The secondary endpoint will be the number of medications taken and polypharmacy users. DISCUSSION: Our trial design is unique in that it aims to introduce a structured operationalized clinical program focused on reducing polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications in a nursing home setting with large samples. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethical approval was granted by the public institutional review board of the Ministry of Health and Welfare (2022-1092-009). The study is also registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (Identifier: KCT0008157, Development and evaluation of a multidisciplinary medication management program in long-term care facility residents Status: Approved First Submitted Date: 2023/01/18 Registered Date: 2023/02/03 Last Updated Date: 2023/01/18 (nih.go.kr) https://cris.nih.go.kr/ ), which includes all items from the World Health Organization Trial Registration Dataset.

Financial impact of medication reviews by clinical pharmacists to reduce in-hospital adverse drug events: a return-on-investment analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events contribute to rising health care costs. Clinical pharmacists can reduce their risks by identifying and solving drug-related problems (DRPs) through medication review. AIM: To develop an economic model to determine whether medication reviews performed by clinical pharmacists could lead to a reduction in health care costs associated with the prevention of potential adverse drug events. METHOD: Two pharmacists performed medication reviews during ward rounds in an internal medicine setting over one year. Avoided costs were estimated by monetizing five categories of DRPs (improper drug selection, drug interactions, untreated indications, inadequate dosages, and drug use without an indication). An expert panel assessed potential adverse drug events and their probabilities of occurrence for 20 randomly selected DRPs in each category. The costs of adverse drug events were extracted from internal hospital financial data. A partial economic study from a hospital perspective then estimated the annual costs avoided by resolving DRPs identified by 3 part-time clinical pharmacists (0.9 full-time equivalent) from 2019 to 2020. The return on investment (ROI) of medication review was calculated. RESULTS: The estimated annual avoided costs associated with the potential adverse drug events induced by 676 DRPs detected was € 304,170. The cost of a 0.9 full-time equivalent clinical pharmacist was € 112,408. Extrapolated to 1 full-time equivalent, the annual net savings was € 213,069 or an ROI of 1-1.71. Sensitivity analyses showed that the economic model was robust. CONCLUSION: This economic model revealed the positive financial impact and favorable return on investment of a medication review intervention performed by clinical pharmacists. These findings should encourage the future deployment of a pharmacist-led adverse drug events prevention program.

Taxonomy development for term standardization in activity resulting from medication review processes: a Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Medication review (MR) is the systematic assessment of a patient's medications for safety and effectiveness by a healthcare professional. The language used to describe MR activity, such as stopped medicine and increased dose, should be consistent across studies to assist researchers compare how different services operate and identify their mechanism of impact. AIM: To develop an international taxonomy of standardized terms and activity definitions related to medication reviews. METHOD: This was a three-stage Delphi-based consensus study with international medication review experts. A systematic review provided MR activity terms for the survey. Experts rated their consensus on each activity term and its definition on a Likert scale and provided written feedback. The consensus was 75% panel agreement. At each stage, consensus elements were retained, and feedback was used to revise definitions. RESULTS: Seven experts were recruited for the study (response rate 15.2%) from four countries: the United Kingdom (n = 4), New Zealand (n = 1), Australia (n = 1), and Malaysia (n = 1). The following terms achieved consensus: the term Medication as a descriptor for MR terms; discontinue medication, start medication, dose increase, dose decrease, dosage form change, and medication safety and efficacy monitor to describe MR activity; Educate to describe the delivery of healthcare professionals and patients/carers education. CONCLUSION: Standardized medication review activity terms and definitions have been selected for universal adoption in all future MR research to facilitate a meaningful comparison of process evaluations within different settings.

Efecto del farmacéutico clínico en las reconsultas a los 30 días posalta del servicio de urgencias: ensayo clínico controlado / Effect of a clinical pharmacist on 30-day revisits following discharge from an emergency department: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Objetivos. Determinar el efecto de la inclusión del farmacéutico clínico en el servicio de urgencias (SU) en las reconsultas durante 30 días posalta y la satisfacción de los pacientes. Métodos. Ensayo clínico controlado, aleatorizado, paralelo y pragmático, realizado en el SU de un hospital universitario. Los pacientes reclutados fueron asignados aleatoriamente al grupo control (GC) que recibió la atención habitual o al grupo intervenido (GI) que recibió además la atención de un farmacéutico clínico, el cual se integró al equipo clínico para optimizar la selección, evaluación y educación farmacoterapéutica en el SU y al alta. El desenlace primario fue reconsultas no programadas 30 días posaltarelacionadas con la atención inicial al SU. Las diferencias entre grupos se analizaron por curvas de supervivencia de Kaplan-Meier y prueba de log-rank. La asociación entre intervención y tiempo al evento fue analizada mediante regresión multivariada de riesgos proporcionales de Cox y se expresó como hazard ratio ajustada (HRa). Resultados. Un total de 1.001 pacientes ingresaron al estudio (GI=500 y GC=501). Ambos grupos eran similares, predominaron las mujeres (61,5%), edad 51 años (RIC: 33-65). La intervención redujo significativamente las reconsultas a cualquier centro durante 30 días posalta comparado con GC [25 (6,3%) vs 66 (16,7%); HRa: 0,29 (IC 95%: 0,17-0,50)] y para el mismo centro [15 (3,0%) vs 32 (6,5%); HRa: 0,46 (IC 95%: 0,24-0,87)]. La satisfacción del usuario fue mayor en el GI que GC (87,2% vs 83,2%; p<0,05). Conclusiones. La inclusión del farmacéutico clínico en un SU reduce sustancialmente las reconsultas durante 30 días posalta y mejora la satisfacción de los usuarios. (AU)

Objectives. To evaluate a clinical pharmacist’s inclusion in emergency department (ED) care in terms of the effect on on 30-day revisits after discharge from the ED and patient satisfaction. Methods. Randomized, controlled parallel-group pragmatic trial in a university hospital ED. Recruited patients were randomly assigned to a control group for standard care only or an intervention group to receive standard care plus the attention of a clinical pharmacist integrated into the care team to optimize the selection and evaluation of medications and provide pharmacotherapeutic education on the patient’s discharge. The primary outcome was unplanned revisits within 30 days after discharge because of the same complaint that led to the initial ED visit. Between-group differences were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. The association between the intervention and time to the outcome event was explored with multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Results. A total of 1001 patients were enrolled (intervention, 500; control, 501). Patients in both groups were similar. A majority were women (61.5%), and the median age (interquartile range) was 51 years (33-65 years). The pharmacist’s intervention significantly reduced the number of 30-day revisits to any ED: 25 (6.3%) revisited vs 66 (16.7%) in the control group. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.17-0.50). Fifteen patients (3.0%) from the intervention group revisited the same ED vs 32 (6.5%) from the control group (aHR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.87]). More patients expressed satisfaction in the intervention group (87.2%) than in the control group ( 83.2%) (P<.05). Conclusions. Including a clinical pharmacist in ED care substantially reduces the number of 30-day revisits and increases patient satisfaction. (AU)

Efecto del farmacéutico clínico en las reconsultas a los 30 días posalta del servicio de urgencias: ensayo clínico controlado / Effect of a clinical pharmacist on 30-day revisits following discharge from an emergency department: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Objetivos. Determinar el efecto de la inclusión del farmacéutico clínico en el servicio de urgencias (SU) en las reconsultas durante 30 días posalta y la satisfacción de los pacientes. Métodos. Ensayo clínico controlado, aleatorizado, paralelo y pragmático, realizado en el SU de un hospital universitario. Los pacientes reclutados fueron asignados aleatoriamente al grupo control (GC) que recibió la atención habitual o al grupo intervenido (GI) que recibió además la atención de un farmacéutico clínico, el cual se integró al equipo clínico para optimizar la selección, evaluación y educación farmacoterapéutica en el SU y al alta. El desenlace primario fue reconsultas no programadas 30 días posaltarelacionadas con la atención inicial al SU. Las diferencias entre grupos se analizaron por curvas de supervivencia de Kaplan-Meier y prueba de log-rank. La asociación entre intervención y tiempo al evento fue analizada mediante regresión multivariada de riesgos proporcionales de Cox y se expresó como hazard ratio ajustada (HRa). Resultados. Un total de 1.001 pacientes ingresaron al estudio (GI=500 y GC=501). Ambos grupos eran similares, predominaron las mujeres (61,5%), edad 51 años (RIC: 33-65). La intervención redujo significativamente las reconsultas a cualquier centro durante 30 días posalta comparado con GC [25 (6,3%) vs 66 (16,7%); HRa: 0,29 (IC 95%: 0,17-0,50)] y para el mismo centro [15 (3,0%) vs 32 (6,5%); HRa: 0,46 (IC 95%: 0,24-0,87)]. La satisfacción del usuario fue mayor en el GI que GC (87,2% vs 83,2%; p<0,05). Conclusiones. La inclusión del farmacéutico clínico en un SU reduce sustancialmente las reconsultas durante 30 días posalta y mejora la satisfacción de los usuarios. (AU)

Objectives. To evaluate a clinical pharmacist’s inclusion in emergency department (ED) care in terms of the effect on on 30-day revisits after discharge from the ED and patient satisfaction. Methods. Randomized, controlled parallel-group pragmatic trial in a university hospital ED. Recruited patients were randomly assigned to a control group for standard care only or an intervention group to receive standard care plus the attention of a clinical pharmacist integrated into the care team to optimize the selection and evaluation of medications and provide pharmacotherapeutic education on the patient’s discharge. The primary outcome was unplanned revisits within 30 days after discharge because of the same complaint that led to the initial ED visit. Between-group differences were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. The association between the intervention and time to the outcome event was explored with multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Results. A total of 1001 patients were enrolled (intervention, 500; control, 501). Patients in both groups were similar. A majority were women (61.5%), and the median age (interquartile range) was 51 years (33-65 years). The pharmacist’s intervention significantly reduced the number of 30-day revisits to any ED: 25 (6.3%) revisited vs 66 (16.7%) in the control group. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.17-0.50). Fifteen patients (3.0%) from the intervention group revisited the same ED vs 32 (6.5%) from the control group (aHR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.87]). More patients expressed satisfaction in the intervention group (87.2%) than in the control group ( 83.2%) (P<.05). Conclusions. Including a clinical pharmacist in ED care substantially reduces the number of 30-day revisits and increases patient satisfaction. (AU)

Deprescribing Opportunities for Frail Residents of Nursing Homes: A Multicenter Study in Australia, China, Japan, and Spain.

OBJECTIVE: Deprescribing opportunities may differ across health care systems, nursing home settings, and prescribing cultures. The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of STOPPFrail medications according to frailty status among residents of nursing homes in Australia, China, Japan, and Spain. DESIGN: Secondary cross-sectional analyses of data from 4 cohort studies. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1142 residents in 31 nursing homes. METHODS: Medication data were extracted from resident records. Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL-NH scale (non-frail 0-2; frail 3-6; most-frail 7-14). Chi-square tests and prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to compare STOPPFrail medication use across cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 84.7% of non-frail, 95.6% of frail, and 90.6% of most-frail residents received ≥1 STOPPFrail medication. Overall, the most prevalent STOPPFrail medications were antihypertensives (53.0% in China to 73.3% in Australia, P < .001), vitamin D (nil in China to 52.7% in Australia, P < .001), lipid-lowering therapies (11.1% in Japan to 38.9% in Australia, P < .001), aspirin (13.5% in Japan to 26.2% in China, P < .001), proton pump inhibitors (2.1% in Japan to 32.0% in Australia, P < .001), and antidiabetic medications (12.3% in Japan to 23.5% in China, P = .010). Overall use of antihypertensives (PR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25), lipid-lowering therapies (PR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18), aspirin (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.64), and antidiabetic medications (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00-1.72) were more prevalent among non-frail and frail residents compared with most-frail residents. Antihypertensive use was more prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Japan, but less prevalent with increasing frailty in Australia. Antidiabetic medication use was less prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Spain but was consistent across frailty groups in Australia and Japan. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: There were overall and frailty-specific variations in prevalence of different STOPPFrail medications across cohorts. This may reflect differences in prescribing cultures, application of clinical practice guidelines in the nursing home setting, and clinician or resident attitudes toward deprescribing.